Search
Latest topics
Department of Government Efficiency
3 posters
Page 1 of 1
Department of Government Efficiency
As president of the United States, I would be a big jerk in a variety of ways. In order to please the nation, I would pretend to be the big stinker they'd like me to be. I would create another department called The Department of Government Efficiency, runned by a fellow jerk. I would tell Congress and the general public that "This new department will clean the "mess" in Washington." Now I wouldn't get into detail. The sole purpose of this department is to eliminate superfluous government positions. They're final act would be to eliminate themselves, finding no other positions they could eliminate, so they would eagerly push to limit government, lest they remove themselves. I would have happy conversations with the Secretary of Government Efficiency. "So, how are the firings going?" . I think the plan is sound. Do you disagree?
Re: Department of Government Efficiency
Sure, as long as you obey the Constitution and slap everyone who disagrees.
Re: Department of Government Efficiency
You have my vote! CheeseKing for president! You may have to drop the "king" part though.
BrianEschen- Experienced Contributor
- Posts : 192
Join date : 2007-12-10
Re: Department of Government Efficiency
lol, I'd definately drop the king part.
So with this additional cabinet, I wouldn't have to worry about eliminating other executive agencies, for the Department of Government Efficiency would do it for me. If I tried to eliminate the EPA, the IRS, and other such agencies, the Congress would rise up and tell me "no!" , even though the agencies are unconstitutional for making laws AND they are part of my branch, so the Congress shouldn't have ANY say in what I do with my agencies. Does the "seperation of powers" ring a bell? Since my cabinet is doing the dirty work, I can just shrug and say "Don't look at me." I was thinking of having a late night talk show, but that is another topic for another time...
So with this additional cabinet, I wouldn't have to worry about eliminating other executive agencies, for the Department of Government Efficiency would do it for me. If I tried to eliminate the EPA, the IRS, and other such agencies, the Congress would rise up and tell me "no!" , even though the agencies are unconstitutional for making laws AND they are part of my branch, so the Congress shouldn't have ANY say in what I do with my agencies. Does the "seperation of powers" ring a bell? Since my cabinet is doing the dirty work, I can just shrug and say "Don't look at me." I was thinking of having a late night talk show, but that is another topic for another time...
Re: Department of Government Efficiency
So would your new name be the CheeseExecutive or would maintaining the "King" moniker be acceptable?
BrianEschen- Experienced Contributor
- Posts : 192
Join date : 2007-12-10
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Sat Oct 22, 2011 12:07 am by HallettStan
» Big Brothers Big Sisters- Recognition for Accountability
Wed May 11, 2011 4:10 am by DONALD C
» Dedicated to Energy
Thu Apr 08, 2010 6:51 am by shulink
» Rest In Peace . . .
Sun Jul 19, 2009 3:09 pm by 89whiteandnerdy
» American Revolution - Biblical?
Thu Jul 09, 2009 2:06 pm by BrianEschen
» Is Slavery Wrong? Why or why not.
Thu Jul 09, 2009 1:51 pm by BrianEschen
» Patriot Act
Tue Jul 07, 2009 11:19 am by YoungStonewall
» God is Just
Mon Apr 06, 2009 1:13 am by CheeseKing
» Questioning More "Facts" From American History
Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:59 pm by BrianEschen